tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57128114266553974442024-03-13T05:34:49.517-07:00The Fair Trade PiratePratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712811426655397444.post-71345052240252131002013-07-08T04:28:00.001-07:002013-07-08T04:28:16.968-07:00Interlude<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;">
Film scores are an integral part of any film. A score may serve to underscore the solemnity of a particular scene, emphasise the resolution of a conflict and generally provide the emotional backdrop on which a film scene is based on. Think of the last time you watched a film scene with no narration, or actors for that matter. It was the film score that established the tone of the scene, and linked it to the next one to form a cohesive whole.</div>
<hr style="background-image: url(http://media.campusdiaries.com/sites/all/themes/campus_diaries/images/dotnew.png); border: medium none; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; height: 10px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0.5em auto; opacity: 0.4; padding: 0px; width: 60px;" />
<span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;">Since its inception, film has been inexorably linked with music. The emotional quality of the film is determined almost solely by its music. Music pulls the strings necessary to immerse the audience fully into the film, allowing them to partake in the same emotional journey as the main characters and thus ensuring that a bond is formed between the viewers and the film.</span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;">
Being a great musician does not necessarily translate to being a great film composer. A film composer must not only know the art of music, but must also understand visual subtlety and tone, to accentuate a scene rather than overpower it. The music is not tacked onto the film, it is a part of it. A great example would be the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VP5jEAP3K4" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">iconic shower scene</a> in Alfred Hitchcock’s classic,<em style="border: 0px; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Psycho</em>. The screeching violins would end up becoming as famous as the scene itself, and are instantly identified even today.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;">
Music may even transcend the film it was composed for, to be used in other works of art. Continuing with the <em style="border: 0px; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Psycho</em> example, most people today probably haven’t ever watched <em style="border: 0px; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Psycho</em> in their lives, or might not even have heard of it, but would definitely have heard its theme before. The same holds true for almost all of John Williams’s compositions, which end up becoming iconic in their own right. Regardless of whether you’ve watched <em style="border: 0px; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Star Wars</em> or not, I guarantee you’ll be humming along when you hear its <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_758004&feature=iv&src_vid=EjMNNpIksaI&v=JG5OsfOuEy0" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">theme</a> playing.</div>
<hr style="background-image: url(http://media.campusdiaries.com/sites/all/themes/campus_diaries/images/dotnew.png); border: medium none; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; height: 10px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0.5em auto; opacity: 0.4; padding: 0px; width: 60px;" />
<span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;">While music does shape the film and underscores its defining moments, the reverse is true as well. </span><em style="border: 0px; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Apocalypse Now</em><span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;">, Francis Ford Coppola’s Vietnam epic, famously used </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz3Cc7wlfkI" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"><em style="border: 0px; color: black; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Ride of the Valkyries</em></a><span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;"> in its opening scene where the American soldiers attack a Vietcong base sheltered in a tiny village. No other composition has been as closely identified with war as </span><em style="border: 0px; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Ride of the Valkyries</em><span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;"> has. However, it was originally used as an overture in plays, to get the audience excited for the show. The music would build up to a crescendo until the curtains would be pulled back to reveal a meeting of the Valkyries. No bullets, no Apache helicopters. Not even some friendly stabbings. Just a meeting. And a fairly boring one at that.</span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;">
Most films that use classical music end up shaping the way our minds interpret the music when we listen to it later on. We always associate certain emotions with certain compositions (think Beethoven’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"><em style="border: 0px; color: black; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Fifth Symphony</em></a> or Mozart’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjXlCCbYX-g" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"><em style="border: 0px; color: black; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">The Marriage of Figaro</em></a>), which certainly becomes helpful when we have no idea what the song is about. <em style="border: 0px; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">The Marriage of Figaro</em> was written as an opera buffa, or a comic opera. While it may have been intended to be interpreted as something comedic, nobody who watched the <em style="border: 0px; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Shawshank Redemption</em> will be laughing.</div>
<hr style="background-image: url(http://media.campusdiaries.com/sites/all/themes/campus_diaries/images/dotnew.png); border: medium none; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; height: 10px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0.5em auto; opacity: 0.4; padding: 0px; width: 60px;" />
<span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;">Film compositions have been created in various ways. The films may be handed to the composers after the primary shooting is complete, allowing the composer to watch the scenes and add what they feel is required. Another way, which many directors such as Christopher Nolan and Steven Spielberg prefer, is to provide the composer with a vague idea of the script (major themes involved in scenes, major character development, plot twists etc.) and allow them to create a series of motifs which can be inserted whenever required into the film. This provides the composers with a lot more freedom, as it allows them to break away from sticking to a highly rigid structure. These motifs also tend to be associated with a certain character or a certain emotion in the film, as opposed to being associated with a single scene. Thus, when they are invariably used again in the film, the audience is provided with an idea of what can be expected from the scene, which completely changes the way they view the film as well. Consider Hans Zimmer’s </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eHgZlzO0Xc" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"><em style="border: 0px; color: black; font-variant: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Lion King</em> score</a><span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;">. The same progression is repeated, albeit with a few changes in tempo or instruments, whenever Simba undergoes any form of character development (the scene where he “remembers “who he is once again, for example). Upon his triumphant return to Pride Rock, the music plays once more, providing closure not only to the characters but to the audience as well.</span><br />
<hr style="background-image: url(http://media.campusdiaries.com/sites/all/themes/campus_diaries/images/dotnew.png); border: medium none; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; height: 10px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0.5em auto; opacity: 0.4; padding: 0px; width: 60px;" />
<span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;"> Film scores don't just add an extra dimension to the film, they are essential to it. No movie watching experience is complete without taking the score into account. It transports us to a world far removed from our own, a world the characters of the movie inhabit. I don't really have a proper conclusion for this article, so I think I'll just </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrFC07KQE5Y" style="border: 0px; color: #0782c1; cursor: pointer; font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">ride off into the sunset</a><span style="font-family: merriweather, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 27px;">. </span></div>
Pratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712811426655397444.post-21177605147372958832013-03-16T20:32:00.002-07:002013-03-16T20:37:11.842-07:00Night Owls<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>A/N: A short poem I wrote on the night, and its myriad wonders.</b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
The night owls are up, the dawn slumbers<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
And though the day had its charms and wonders,</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Still we must move on, the stars beckon,<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
And while we lack a crowd, we have company, I reckon.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
For no man is an island; the island has the sea,<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
And know that you are never alone, while you still have me.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
For spirit is not contained by earthly bonds, nor ‘fraid of
sticks and stones<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
The calls traverse the lakes and ponds, through still air
and shivering bones.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Yea’, we are a single entity, but we are multiple wonders,<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
As the night owls fly on, and the dawn slumbers.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs26/i/2008/107/f/8/Night_Owl_by_allison712.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs26/i/2008/107/f/8/Night_Owl_by_allison712.jpg" width="245" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Spread your wings, night owl. The stars beckon.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Pratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712811426655397444.post-8826191461811687922012-11-15T04:04:00.002-08:002013-03-16T20:37:58.075-07:00The Tale of Alice<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
The cold. Whenever she looked back on that time, that was
what stood out the most. The shivers. “It would get better”, the doctors had
assured her. Of course it would. And it had. For the most part. But her demons
had never truly left her, and probably never would. It was part of her now; she
had come to accept that. Their grins still haunted her nightmares; eternal
smiles <i>lingering,</i> long after their
bodies had faded away. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
She could never quite remember when the hallucinations
began. The doctors had said that they were a defence mechanism, a way for her
body to cope with the abuse. When you have a neglectful mother, and a drunkard
father, where was a young girl to go? A magical escape, to a magical land. Not
that there was anything truly magical about it. But she had realised that far
too late.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Alice sighed, brushing away the strands of hair that
cascaded across her face. The past was not a place she liked to visit, but it
was required. A new form of therapy, they told her. A way to finally set
yourself free. Alice didn’t want to be set free. She had tried it once, and
look where that got her. Institutionalised. Always looked down upon. Forever a <i>freak</i>. Unfortunately, she had no say in
the matter. Perhaps she never did.<o:p></o:p><br />
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Tea, Alice?” asked her therapist, seated across from her.
“No, thank you”, was the hurried reply. Alice and tea were not on good terms.
Not since her youth. Alice took a moment to study her therapist. A pretty
woman, probably younger than Alice was. She had an air of affected disinterest,
but Alice knew it was only for show. Surreptitiously, the therapist was
analysing Alice as one would an interesting species of insect. That was all
Alice was to them. A specimen, an object to be scrutinised, played with,
experimented on. Alice felt a wave of paranoia crashing upon her. The walls
seemed to be closing in. How could she escape from this? What new means would
they now use to dissect her?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Breathe, Alice”, the therapist said, breaking Alice out of
her reverie. A hint of a smile was now on the therapist’s face. “There’s no
need to be so frightened, I’m just here to talk. Have the new pills helped at
all?” “Just fine, thanks”, replied Alice.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Any nightmares recently?” <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Just the one. You know…the one with all the clocks. I’d
rather not talk about it.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“I understand. Take your time.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Alice settled back into a contemplative silence. If there
was one thing she had plenty of, it was time.
That was her one luxury, back when they kept her in the room with all
the padded walls. She supposed that she should have been grateful. After all,
they had given her a new life. One away from her family. But the only feeling
she could muster was regret. Regret that
she hadn’t spoken up sooner. Regret that she hadn't realised the pain she was
causing to herself. Regret that she found only herself to blame. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Alice caught herself. That was not a path of questions that
she should follow. They would only lead to disappointment and depression. After
all, how could she have possibly known the danger she was in? How close she was
to losing her mind, to locking herself out of this world? All she saw were the
pretty colours, the bright lights. And they had helped her. She was better now.
Maybe the nightmares would stop too. Eventually, she might even be considered
normal again. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“You know, doctor, the pills have helped me quite a bit, to
be honest. I’m starting to feel more like myself again.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“That’s great, Alice! And please, call me Carol.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Well, thank you, Carol. You've helped me put my life back
together. I honestly couldn't be more grateful.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Just doing my job, Alice. This is excellent progress. I’m
glad you’re on the path to recovery. See you the same time, next week, then?”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Of course. Goodbye, Carol.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Bye, Alice.”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As Alice crossed the makeshift lawn in front of her
therapist’s office, she thought she noticed something out of the corner of her
eye. A white rabbit, scurrying down a burrow as it chased after its out of
sight prey. The rabbit hole almost seemed to close up behind it, giving privacy
to its owner; shutting the world away. The sun poked out, its light appearing
to spread hope with every ray. Alice smiled. It was a new beginning. <o:p></o:p></div>
<br /></div>
Pratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712811426655397444.post-26277904371921727112012-10-20T09:35:00.000-07:002013-03-16T20:38:59.902-07:00The Trouble with Licensing- Part 2<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<b>A\N:</b>It's been a while since I last updated. There were a myriad of reasons for this, but mostly it was laziness. I apologize to my readers, and I promise to be more regular from now on.<br />
<br />
So we've covered a few of the problems associated with licensing in art. But we still haven't arrived at the crux of the issue: Is it worth it?<br />
<br />
Personally, I feel that it all comes down to the creator, and how much they're willing to let go of their creations. Some claim they suffer something akin to post-partum depression upon allowing licensing, while others staunchly swear by it and its advantages in the modern byte-for-your-thought world. In other ways, it also boils down to how we as a society allow artists to profit from their creations.<br />
<br />
For some reason, the introduction of money instantly dilutes the product, and we immediately criticise the artist for "selling out". But is it really selling out? Haven't we all sold out, just by joining a certain corporation or endorsing a certain product? What makes artists better (or alternatively, worse) than us that they simply aren't offered the option to make money without someone calling them out on their credibility? At the end of the day, artists are just human beings, and human beings need to eat. Since when has someone being allowed to make a fair profit for their work become the work of the devil?<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/soul1_wideweb__470x323,0.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="219" src="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/2008/07/02/soul1_wideweb__470x323,0.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
Perhaps we wish for artists to be the anti-establishment voices of dissent that we never were. Considering the amount of analysis and thought that goes into the <i>discussion</i> of the creation, it's only natural that we pour our <i>own</i> souls into the creation, and we'd prefer not to tarnish pure imagination with something as practical as money. Maybe we’re all clinging on to that inner artist of ours, just
waiting to be let out. We know that the artist in us would <i>never</i> compromise on their principles, no sir. So we project our
dreams and wishes onto our favourite creators, and with the inevitable
disappointment comes the even more inevitable backlash.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://identidaddemarca.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/snoopymetlife.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://identidaddemarca.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/snoopymetlife.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Oh Snoopy. What would Woodstock say?</span></div>
<br /></div>
Perhaps it is not our right to question our favourite creators on their decisions. So, to all you <i>Star Wars</i>, <i>Garfield</i>, heck, even <i>Peanuts</i> fans, let go. Relax. Don't try to control the ride. After all, it was never yours to begin with.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/74/GandF.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/74/GandF.gif" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">But seriously, watch this show. It's awesome.</span></div>
<br />
So let's get back to that question of ours: Is it worth it? To tell you the truth, I think it probably is. After all, there's no reason for you to not have control over the licensing itself, and in the case of creations like <i>Garfield</i>, the adapted versions may surpass the original. Sure, you may be occasionally unhappy, but I'd rather cry in a Porsche than fake a smile in a Prius. Probably. I haven't done either, so I can't really say for sure. As to any questions on whether I've sold my soul or not, I haven't. This blog is one hundred percent by me, and I will not allow it to be influenced by anybody, ever. I've managed to keep it this free by powering up my brain through the invigorating deliciousness of Kellogg's Cornflakes! This out of the blue endorsement is completely authentic, because eating Kellogg's products and praising them doesn't come from the allure of money. It comes from your heart.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.yes-zim.com/shopimages/products/normal/cornflakes200.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.yes-zim.com/shopimages/products/normal/cornflakes200.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Seriously, buy them. You won't regret it.</span></div>
<br /></div>
Pratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712811426655397444.post-34319180081447694772012-09-30T09:26:00.001-07:002013-03-16T20:38:49.164-07:00The Trouble with Licensing- Part 1<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
Licensing has long been any creative cretin's bread and butter. With the power of licensing, they ensure for themselves a comfortable existence as they attempt to broaden the human consciousness. But this comfort comes with a dark side, for they essentially sell their soul to a corporation in order to enjoy a life of luxury. For some artists, this is a fate worse than death. A laboured love of creation is not something that can be handed over in an instant, and is equivalent to giving up a child.<br />
<br />
Of course, for others, the art is merely a means to an end. Jim Davis, the creator of <i>Garfield</i>, for example, admitted that the sole reason the orange tabby ever came about was so that he could create a merchandising empire. But the fact is that for the vast majority of artists, licensing can be seen as the kiss of death for their creations. So, the question is, is licensing a necessary evil?<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/46/Garfieldand_friends.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/46/Garfieldand_friends.png" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
One of the most common arguments against licensing is that it dilutes the product. This is true to an extent, but it's not necessary that the changes are always adverse in nature. For example, I've always preferred the wry humour of the Garfield TV show to the comics themselves (the movie, on the other hand...well, some things are better left un-watched). Let's take another example to see how this works. On the opposite end of the spectrum of Jim Davis is another comic book artist, Bill Watterson. Mr. Watterson has steadfastly refused to partake in licensing of any kind, and there has been no official merchandise of <i>Calvin and Hobbes</i> ever released. But the key word there is <i>official</i>. Nearly everybody has seen the "pissing Calvin" images. Everybody who has actually read the comics knows that this is an inaccurate depiction of Calvin (for one thing, there is a severe lack of dinosaurs), but the images are ridiculously popular. Due to ill-defined trademarks, <i>Calvin</i> is one of the most bootlegged creations of all time. Sure, Bill might have felt that licensing might have lead to poor animated TV shows and the like (not to mention the potential for actual Hobbes stuffed tigers), but it has led to unofficial proliferation of his beloved characters all the same. Frankly, I'd prefer the real deal.<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bookriot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/calvin-and-hobbes-e1328550590232.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://bookriot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/calvin-and-hobbes-e1328550590232.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
Licensing also comes with responsibilities. Like it or not, the people who have put money into your product expect to see something accessible, something to appeal to the lowest common denominator. You give up a lot of freedom when you start licensing. This is where a character like Garfield comes in handy. Everybody hates Mondays, and (nearly) everybody loves lasagna. But do you think the strip of Calvin blowing up his school would have been made it into syndication if kids were also tuning into Calvin's misadventures on Saturday morning? It'd be highly unlikely to say the least. Perhaps that was Bill Watterson is trying to hang onto. His artistic integrity.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://picayune.uclick.com/comics/ch/1988/ch881106.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://picayune.uclick.com/comics/ch/1988/ch881106.gif" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
So we've tackled some of the cons (and pros) of licensing. But the key question, "Is it worth it?", remains to be answered. Stay tuned...<br />
<br />
</div>
Pratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712811426655397444.post-84042976471470030022012-09-19T07:45:00.000-07:002012-09-20T05:53:47.391-07:00FaceOff: The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">FaceOff:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Welcome to FaceOff, where I will be taking two similar or
equally influential pop culture figures, and compare them. Please note that
this is not a typical ‘who’s better’ blog, as that is just a pointless exercise
in brain power and is ultimately a futile experience. Not to mention that I
will be attacked by rabid fans no matter which way I turn, so I’d rather not
bring that pressure on myself<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
…<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Moving on.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So, as I said ,this is not your typical comparison. Instead,
what I will be comparing is how two bands who started at the same time, but had
fundamentally different approaches in their music, grew to where they are
today.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Origins</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I’d rather not go into details, as both these bands’ origin
stories have been repeated so often that there’s no point in me repeating a
tired tale. Here’s how it goes.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Liverpool. Skiffle. Mommy issues. Aunty issues. Hamburg.
Death. Drums Issues. Hamburg. Record Deal. (Almost) Instant Stardom.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/The_Fabs.JPG/220px-The_Fabs.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/The_Fabs.JPG/220px-The_Fabs.JPG" /></a></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">The Beatles: John, Paul, George and um...sorry, can't place the last one</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
And on the other end, London. Blues Incorporated. Phone
Calls. Unfiled Muddy Waters LPs. Embarrassed Decca. Various changes. England’s
Newest Hit-Makers.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/Stones_members_montage2.jpg/218px-Stones_members_montage2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/Stones_members_montage2.jpg/218px-Stones_members_montage2.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">A rolling stone gathers no moss.Wrinkles, on the other hand..</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Image</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In contrast to the Beatles’ clean-cut image, the Stones
presented themselves as the wild boys of rock n’ roll. This was done deliberately,
in order to appeal to that section of society that found the Beatles “too
poppy” (Yes, even in the 60s, when things were just getting started, pop music
was derided. Go figure). However, both these images were manufactured. The
Beatles’ image was manufactured by their manager, Brian Epstein, in order to
replace their previous, raucous, wild stage personas. Indeed, if one were to
look at their origins, the Beatles (working class Liverpudlians) might be
considered even more rowdy than the Stones (middle class Londoners). The Stones
were manufactured by their manager, Andrew Oldham. A former publicist for the
Beatles, Oldham saw potential in the group being positioned as an
"anti-Beatles" - a rougher group compared to the "cuddly
moptop" image of the Beatles at that time.
This, by the way, proves that selling out doesn’t necessarily mean
losing artistic credibility and/or talent (You’re welcome, punk rock bands). <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://ickmusic.com/pics/sexpistols1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="http://ickmusic.com/pics/sexpistols1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Oh, they were manufactured too. Sorry, punk rock fans.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Sound</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Both groups have a varied and diverse soundscape, but I’ve
always found the Beatles to be the more innovative of the two. In fact, the
Stones were seen as a throwback to the R&B and blues bands of old. Also,
I’ve always found that the Stones seemed to ape whatever trend was in fashion
at the moment, be it psychedilia (Their Satanic Majesties Request) or glam rock
(It’s Only Rock n’ Roll), while the Beatles were constantly paving new ground.
I’m sure I’ll get some criticism for that view point, but it is what it is.
Sure, the Stones rocked harder, but at the end of the day, it was the Beatles that
made rock n’ roll what it is today.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/spjcPS4ekOA?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">A masterpiece in psychedilia...</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/Eyz0WraN3LU?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Sure, it doesn't break any new ground, but who said that's a requirement for good music?</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Live Performances</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
No contest here. The Beatles were a fine live band in their
own right, but they didn’t hold a candle to the Stones. In fact, I’d go as far
as to say that what the Rolling Stones did for live performances was as ground
breaking as what the Beatles did for studio innovation. Some may cite the fact
that the Beatles stopped touring in the mid-60s as a reason for this setback,
but I don’t think they’d ever be able to match the Stones. The Stones were <i>raw, </i>and showed us the wild side of rock
music. (Of course, neither of the groups holds a candle to the Who in this
category, but that’s a topic for another post).<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/Dt0ipUCfdlU?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Have some sympathy for the Beatles...or don't, seeing as they could buy your sympathy and then make it do the waltz with your dignity, and then they all laugh at your overly long captions...</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Conclusion</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So there you have it. Not a very thorough list, but I just
wanted to highlight what I felt were the two groups’ biggest strengths. While
the Beatles represented the creative and genius of rock n’ roll and pop music
in general, the Stones showed us its wild and beautiful side. <o:p></o:p></div>
</div>
Pratik Rameshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07559245188199184200noreply@blogger.com